4.8 Article

Tunable Surface Structuration of Silicon by Metal Assisted Chemical Etching with Pt Nanoparticles under Electrochemical Bias

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 31375-31384

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09036

关键词

metal assisted chemical etching; c-Si; platinum; cyclic voltammetry; impedance spectroscopy; 2D band bending modeling; Si texturization; cone-shaped macropores

资金

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE07-0005-01]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE07-0005] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-depth study of metal assisted chemical etching (MACE) of p-type c-Si in HF/H2O2 aqueous solutions using Pt nanoparticles as catalysts is presented. Combination of cyclic voltammetry, open circuit measurements, chronoamperometry, impedance spectroscopy, and 2D band bending modeling of the metal/semiconductor/electrolyte interfaces at the nanoscale and under different etching conditions allows gaining physical insights into this system. Additionally, in an attempt to mimic the etching conditions, the modeling has been performed with a positively biased nanoparticle buried in the Si substrate. Following these findings, the application of an external polarization during etching is introduced as a novel efficient approach for achieving straightforward control of the pore morphology by acting upon the band bending at the Si/electrolyte junction. In this way, nanostructures ranging from straight mesopores to cone-shaped macropores are obtained as the Si sample is biased from negative to positive potentials. Remarkably, macroscopic cone-shaped pores in the 1-5 mu m size range with a high aspect ratio (L/W similar to 1.6) are obtained by this method. This morphology leads to a reduction of the surface reflectance below 5% over the entire VIS-NIR domain, which outperforms macrostructures made by state of the art texturization techniques for Si solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据