4.3 Article

Distribution and Antioxidant Activities of Free, Conjugated, and Insoluble-Bound Phenolics from Seven Species of the Genus Camellia

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aocs.12172

关键词

Oil-tea camellia seed; Free phenolic (FP) acids; Conjugated phenolic (CP) acids; Insoluble-bound phenolic (IBP); Species

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds of CAF [CAFYBB2014QA007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31700605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Free phenolic (FP), conjugated phenolic (CP), and insoluble-bound phenolic (IBP) acids were extracted from the seeds of seven species of oil-tea camellia and their antioxidant activities were evaluated. The results indicated that Camellia vietnamensis has the highest total phenolic content (TPC) (31.84 +/- 0.11 g of gallic acid equivalent [GAE] kg(-1)) and that Camellia polyodontia has the lowest TPC (12.34 +/- 0.22 g GAE kg(-1)) in the kernel. The average TPC among the species is similar in both the kernels and in the shells, and the content order of the three forms of phenolic compounds is FP > IBP > CP. HPLC-MS analysis showed the presence of 9-11 phenolic compounds in the FP, CP, or IBP extracts of the seven species of oil-tea camellia seed. Among the phenolics identified, ferulic acid, catechin, and epicatechin were the major contributors of antioxidant activity. Hierarchical cluster analysis conducted based on the phenolic properties showed that C. vietnamensis and Camellia semiserrata belong to the group characterized by high antioxidant capacities (FRAP, ferric-ion-reducing antioxidant power; ABTS assay), and Camellia chekiangoleosa and Camellia oleifera are arranged in a group with moderate phenolic properties. The other species constitute the third cluster with low phenolic content and antioxidant activity. The study demonstrated that oil-tea camellia seed contains significant amounts of phenolic acids. In addition, extracts from various parts of the seed could be interesting novel sources of natural antioxidants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据