4.6 Article

Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 66, 期 10, 页码 2009-2016

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15465

关键词

patient priorities; practice change; older adults; multimorbidity

资金

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation
  2. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  5. Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale University School of Medicine [P30AG021342 NIH/NIA]
  6. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care at the New York University School of Medicine
  7. Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey VAMC [CIN 13-413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) receive care that is fragmented and burdensome, lacks evidence, and most importantly is not focused on what matters most to them. An implementation feasibility study of Patient Priorities Care (PPC), a new approach to care that is based on health outcome goals and healthcare preferences, was conducted. This study took place at 1 primary care and 1 cardiology practice in Connecticut and involved 9 primary care providers (PCPs), 5 cardiologists, and 119 older adults with MCCs. PPC was implemented using methods based on a practice change framework and continuous plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Core elements included leadership support, clinical champions, priorities facilitators, training, electronic health record (EHR) support, workflow development and continuous modification, and collaborative learning. PPC processes for clinic workflow and decision-making were developed, and clinicians were trained. After 10 months, 119 older adults enrolled and had priorities identified; 92 (77%) returned to their PCP after priorities identification. In 56 (46%) of these visits, clinicians documented patient priorities discussions. Workflow challenges identified and solved included patient enrollment lags, EHR documentation of priorities discussions, and interprofessional communication. Time for clinicians to provide PPC remains a challenge, as does decision-making, including clinicians' perceptions that they are already doing so; clinicians' concerns about guidelines, metrics, and unrealistic priorities; and differences between PCPs and patients and between PCPs and cardiologists about treatment decisions. PDSA cycles and continuing collaborative learning with national experts and peers are taking place to address workflow and clinical decision-making challenges. Translating disease-based to priorities-aligned decision-making appears challenging but feasible to implement in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据