4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Near Infrared Fluorescent Lymph Node Mapping with Indocyanine Green in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
卷 228, 期 4, 页码 672-678

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.001

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Near infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is an emerging modality that can enable real-time image-guided procedures. Indocyanine green (ICG) is an FDA-approved, inexpensive, and widely available NIR dye. We hypothesized that axillary lymphatic mapping with ICG is equivalent to lymphatic mapping with technetium 99m (Tc-99m) in breast cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Breast cancer patients (cT1-2, N0) were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent lymphatic mapping with Tc-99m preoperatively and ICG mapping intraoperatively (0.8 mL). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was guided by NIR camera and gamma probe. Rate of failed mapping, number of SLNs identified, and rate of identifying pathologically positive SLNs were compared between the 2 techniques (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: Ninety-two female patients were enrolled (median age 59 years). Mean transit time from ICG injection in the breast to localization in the axilla was 5 minutes (range 2 to 29 minutes). No adverse reactions to ICG were noted. Mean number of SLNs identified with ICG and Tc-99m was 2.4 (SD 1.42) and 2.2 (SD 1.23), respectively (p = 0.34). Pathologically positive SLNs were identified in 18 (19.8%) patients. A total of 24 pathologically positive SLNs in 18 patients were identified by ICG in 24 of 24 (100%) patients and by Tc-99m in 23 of 24 (96%) patients (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Indocyanine green with NIR fluorescence imaging can be safely and efficiently used for realtime intraoperative lymphatic mapping in breast cancer patients. Indocyanine green performs similarly to Tc-99m with regard to the number of SLNs identified, rate of failed mapping, and identification of pathologically positive SLNs. (C) 2018 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据