4.7 Article

Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Healthy Men and Women

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 19, 页码 2283-2292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2166

关键词

cancer mortality; cardiovascular disease; exercise testing; physical fitness

资金

  1. American Heart Association Award [18AIREA33930023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND There is a well-established inverse relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and mortality. However, this relationship has almost exclusively been studied using estimated CRF. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the association of directly measured CRF, obtained using cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality in apparently healthy men and women. METHODS Participants included 4,137 self-referred apparently healthy adults (2,326 men, 1,811 women; mean age: 42.8 +/- 12.2 years) who underwent CPX testing to determine baseline CRF. Participants were followed for 24.2 +/- 11.7 years (1.1 to 49.3 years) for mortality. Cox-proportional hazard models were performed to determine the relationship of CRF (ml . kg(-1).min(-1)) and CRF level (low, moderate, and high) with mortality outcomes. RESULTS During follow-up, 727 participants died (524 men, 203 women). CPX-derived CRF was inversely related to all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. Low CRF was associated with higher risk for all-cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20 to 3.50), CVD (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.20 to 3.49), and cancer (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.18 to 3.36) mortality compared with high CRF. Further, each metabolic equivalent increment increase in CRF was associated with a 11.6%, 16.1%, and 14.0% reductions in all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Given the prognostic ability of CPX-derived CRF for all-cause and disease-specific mortality outcomes, its use should be highly considered for apparently healthy populations as it may help to improve the efficacy of the individualized patient risk assessment and guide clinical decisions. (c) 2018 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据