4.7 Article

Economic and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Natriuretic Peptide-Guided Therapy for Heart Failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 21, 页码 2551-2562

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2184

关键词

biomarkers; economics; heart failure; left ventricular dysfunction; quality of life

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health [R01 HL105451, R01 HL105448, R01 HL105457]
  2. Merck
  3. Oxygen Therapeutics
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. University of Calgary
  6. Eli Lilly Company
  7. AGA Medical
  8. St. Jude Medical
  9. Tufts University
  10. GE Healthcare
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Pfizer
  13. Tenax Therapeutics
  14. Gilead
  15. Bayer
  16. Novartis
  17. Roche Diagnostics
  18. Abbott Diagnostics
  19. Siemens
  20. Singulex
  21. Prevencio
  22. Cleveland Heart Labs
  23. National Institutes of Health
  24. CVR Global
  25. ResMed
  26. Fibrogen
  27. CVRx
  28. Cytokinetics
  29. CSL Behring
  30. Amgen
  31. Luitpold
  32. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  33. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  34. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The GUIDE-IT (GUIDing Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure) trial prospectively compared the efficacy of an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided heart failure treatment strategy (target NT-proBNP level <1,000 pg/ml) with optimal medical therapy alone in high-risk patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. When the study was stopped for futility, 894 patients had been enrolled. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess treatment-related quality-of-life (QOL) and economic outcomes in the GUIDE-IT trial. METHODS The authors prospectively collected a battery of QOL instruments at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-randomization (collection rates 90% to 99% of those eligible). The principal pre-specified QOL measures were the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Cost data were collected for 735 (97%) U.S. patients. RESULTS Baseline variables were well balanced in the 446 patients randomized to the NT-proBNP-guided therapy and 448 to usual care. Both the KCCQ and the DASI improved over the first 6 months, but no evidence was found for a strategy-related difference (mean difference [biomarker-guided - usual care] at 24 months of follow-up 2.0 for DASI [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.3 to 5.3] and 1.1 for KCCQ [95% CI: -3.7 to 5.9]). Total winsorized costs averaged $5,919 higher in the biomarker-guided strategy (95% CI: -$1,795, +$13,602) over 15-month median follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A strategy of NT-proBNP-guided HF therapy had higher total costs and was not more effective than usual care in improving QOL outcomes in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment [GUIDE-IT]; NCT01685840) (c) 2018 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据