4.7 Review

Inflammation, Immunity, and Infection in Atherothrombosis JACC Review Topic of the Week

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 17, 页码 2071-2081

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1043

关键词

basic & translational research

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HL080472, U01HL28606, R01HL076801]
  2. RRM Charitable Fund
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HL119145, HG007690, GM107618, HL061795]
  4. American Heart Association grant Scaling the Computation of Predicting Drug Protein Interactions
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K24AI112393]
  6. NIH [R01HL125034, R01DE014079]
  7. Novartis
  8. Kowa
  9. Pfizer
  10. Amgen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observations on human and experimental atherosclerosis, biomarker studies, and now a large-scale clinical trial support the operation of immune and inflammatory pathways in this disease. The factors that incite innate and adaptive immune responses implicated in atherogenesis and in lesion complication include traditional risk factors such as protein and lipid components of native and modified low-density lipoprotein, angiotensin II, smoking, visceral adipose tissue, and dys-metabolism. Infectious processes and products of the endogenous microbiome might also modulate atherosclerosis and its complications either directly, or indirectly by eliciting local and systemic responses that potentiate disease expression. Trials with antibiotics have not reduced recurrent cardiovascular events, nor have vaccination strategies yet achieved clinical translation. However, anti-inflammatory interventions such as anticytokine therapy and colchicine have begun to show efficacy in this regard. Thus, inflammatory and immune mechanisms can link traditional and emerging risk factors to atherosclerosis, and offer novel avenues for therapeutic intervention. (c) 2018 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据