4.8 Article

Efficiently Enhancing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Faceted TiO2 Nanocrystals by Synergistic Effects of Core-Shell Structured Au@CdS Nanoparticles and Their Selective Deposition

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 33, 页码 21326-21333

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b05563

关键词

visible light photocatalytic activity; H-2 evolution; Au@CdS nanoparticles; TiO2; selective deposition; charge separation

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB932301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473146, 21333008]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20720160026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrating wide bandgap semiconductor photo catalysts with visible-light-active inorganic nanoparticles (such as Au and CdS) as sensitizers is one of the most efficient methods to improve their photocatalytic activity in the visible light region. However, as for all such composite photocatalysts, a rational design and precise control over their architecture is often required to achieve optimal performance. Herein, a new TiO2-based ternary composite photocatalyst with superior visible light activity was designed and synthesized. In this composite photocatalyst, the location of the visible light sensitizers was engineered according to the intrinsic facet induced effect of well-faceted TiO2 nanocrystals on the spatial separation of photogenerated carriers. Experimentally, core shell structured Au@CdS nanoparticles acting as visible light sensitizers were selectively deposited onto photoreductive {101} facets of well-faceted anatase TiO2 nanocrystals through a two-step in situ photodeposition route. Because the combination of Au@CdS and specific {101} facets of TiO2 nanocrystals facilitates the transport of charges photogenerated under visible light irradiation, this well-designed ternary composite photocatalyst exhibited superior activity in visible-light-driven photocatalytic H-2 evolution, as expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据