4.8 Article

Tailoring Graphene Nanosheets for Highly Improved Dispersion Stability and Quantitative Assessment in Nonaqueous Solvent

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 33, 页码 21595-21602

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b07272

关键词

graphene oxide; covalent functionalization; dispersion stability; quantitative assessment; ethylene glycol

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2014R1A2A1A11052829]
  2. Hyundai Motor Company [2.150078.01]
  3. Global Ph.D. Fellowship (GPF) - National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2014H1A2A1018269]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014H1A2A1018269] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregation is a critical limitation for the practical application of graphene-based materials. Herein, we report that graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets chemically modified with ethanolamine (EA), ethylene glycol (EG), and sulfanilic acid (SA) demonstrate superior dispersion stability in organic solvents, specifically EG, based on the differences in their covalent chemistries. Functionalized GO was successfully dispersed in EG at a concentration of 9.0 mg mL(-1) (0.50 vol %), the highest dispersion concentration reported to date. Moreover, our study introduces a unique analytical method for the assessment of dispersion stability and successfully quantifies the instability index based on transmission profiles under centrifugation cycles. Interestingly, GO-EG and GO-EA exhibited highly improved dispersion stabilities approximately 96 and 48 times greater than that of GO in EG solvent, respectively. This finding highlights the critical role of surface functional groups in the enhancement of chemical affinity and miscibility in the surrounding media. We anticipate that the novel structural designs and unique tools presented in this study will further the understanding and application of chemically functionalized carbon materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据