4.8 Article

Guiding Synthesis of Polymorphs of Materials Using Nanometric Phase Diagrams

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 49, 页码 17290-17296

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b11029

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR150038, 1605692, 1739884, 1550423]
  2. Georgia Institute of Technology
  3. DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. DOE Office of Science by National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-SC0012704]
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1550423] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1605692] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventionally, phase diagrams serve as road maps for the design and synthesis of materials. However, bulk phase diagrams are often not as predictive for the synthesis of nanometric materials, mainly due to the increased significance of surface energy. The change of surface energy can drastically alter the total energy of the nanocrystals and thus yields a polymorph or metastable phase different from the stable phase in bulk, providing a means for controlling the synthesis of metastable phases. To achieve a theoretical and systematical understanding on the polymorphism of nanomaterials, metallic cobalt was chosen as a model system, where the two polymorphs, fcc and hcp phases, can be tuned with 100% selectivity in a solvothermal reaction. Advanced in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were complementarily employed to reveal the size- and surface-dependent polymorphism at nanometer scale. The nanometric phase diagram provides a general predictive approach to guide the synthesis of metastable materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据