4.8 Article

Amphiphilic-DNA Platform for the Design of Crystalline Frameworks with Programmable Structure and Functionality

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 140, 期 45, 页码 15384-15392

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b09143

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC Programme Grant CAPITALS [EP/J017566/1]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [ECF2015-494]
  3. Isaac Newton Trust [ECF2015-494]
  4. Royal Society [UF160152]
  5. EPSRC CDT in Nanoscience and Nano technology (NanoDTC) [EP/L015978/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/J017566/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliable preparation of functional, ordered, nano-structured frameworks would be a game changer for many emerging technologies, from energy storage to nanomedicine. Underpinned by the excellent molecular recognition of nucleic acids, along with their facile synthesis and breadth of available functionalizations, DNA nanotechnology is widely acknowledged as a prime route for the rational design of nanostructured materials. Yet, the preparation of crystalline DNA frameworks with programmable structure and functionality remains a challenge. Here we demonstrate the potential of simple amphiphilic DNA motifs, dubbed C-stars, as a versatile platform for the design of programmable DNA crystals. In contrast to all-DNA materials, in which structure depends on the precise molecular details of individual building blocks, the self-assembly of C-stars is controlled uniquely by their topology and symmetry. Exploiting this robust self assembly principle, we design a range of topologically identical, but structurally and chemically distinct C-stars that following a one-pot reaction self-assemble into highly porous, functional, crystalline frameworks. Simple design variations allow us to finetune the lattice parameter and thus control the partitioning of macromolecules within the frameworks, embed responsive motifs that can induce isothermal disassembly, and include chemical moieties to capture target proteins specifically and reversibly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据