4.5 Article

Long noncoding RNA LINC01133 inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through a feedback regulation loop with GDF15

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 118, 期 8, 页码 1326-1334

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.25278

关键词

feedback regulation loop; growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15); LINC01133; metastasis; oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)

资金

  1. Postdoctoral Foundation of Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine [5021606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives Methods Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play key roles in carcinoma metastasis. We aimed to investigate lncRNA LINC01133 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) metastasis. The RNA levels of LINC01133 and growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in tissue samples from OSCC patients, and OSCC cell lines were tested by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). SPSS20.0 was used to perform statistical analysis of LINC01133 expression in clinical samples and correlate expression of LINC01133 and GDF15. Cell migration/invasion was assessed via transwell assays. Downstream genes of LINC01133 were screened using RNA-seq and validated by RT-qPCR. GDF15 protein levels were evaluated via Western blot analysis. Results Conclusions LINC01133 was downregulated in OSCCs; higher expression of LINC01133 in OSCCs was correlated with less metastasis and better prognosis. LINC01133 inhibited OSCC cell migration and invasion. RNA-seq data showed that LINC01133 inhibited GDF15, and GDF15 could rescue inhibition of OSCC cell migration and invasion caused by LINC01133. Interestingly, GDF15 also inhibited LINC01133. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation between expression of LINC01133 and GDF15 was validated in the clinical study. Collectively, these data indicate that LINC01133 inhibited OSCC metastasis via a feedback regulation loop of reciprocal inhibition with GDF15, suggesting a new diagnostic and therapeutic target for OSCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据