4.8 Article

Realizing Highly Efficient Inverted Photovoltaic Cells by Combination of Nonconjugated Small-Molecule Zwitterions with Polyethylene Glycol

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 28, 页码 18593-18599

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b04955

关键词

polymer solar cells; inverted and conventional devices; cathode interlayers; zwitterions; charge recombination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273208, 51403222, 61474125]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR14E030002]
  3. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau [2014B82010]
  4. National Young Top-Notch Talent Program of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic ionic materials have been reported to be efficient cathode interlayer (CIL) materials in polymer solar cells (PSCs); however, most of them are employed in conventional PSCs. For an inverted structural device which has better stability, the efficiency is still far from expectation and the report is also limited. In this study, by using nonconjugated zwitterions as the CIL and inverted structure, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) is similar to 6%, though the PCE can reach 9.14% in the conventional device. By introducing polyethylene glycol (PEG) into the zwitterions, the PCE of the inverted PSCs was improved similar to 33% and reached similar to 8% mainly because of the enhancement of the open circuit voltage (V-oc) and fill factor (FF). Further research on the device parameters, work functions, morphology of indium tin oxide (ITO) with various CILs, and recombination resistance of the devices indicated that PEG + zwitterion induced not only a lower work function of ITO but also a more uniform morphology of CILs with less contact of the photoactive layer with ITO, which induced suppressed charge recombination and a higher Voc and FF. Enhanced ability in interface modification of PEG + zwitterion CILs displayed a simple and feasible approach to elevate the performance of inverted PSCs with ionic CILs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据