4.1 Article

Inferring bottom circulation based on sediment pattern distribution in the San Jose Gulf, Patagonia Argentina

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 189-196

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2018.10.013

关键词

Grain-size distribution; Sediment transport; Wind stress; Bottom hydrodynamics; Semi-enclosed basin; Frontal system

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica from Argentina [PICT 2014-1498, PICT 2012-1331, PICT 2015-1715, PICT 2015-1837, 6213/15]
  2. ALUAR S.A.I.C [6213/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this work was to infer the spatio-temporal patterns of bottom circulation of San Jose Gulf (SJG), Patagonia, Argentina. The SJG is mainly affected by tidal circulation and presents two hydrographic domains. The Western Hydrographic Domain (WHD) presents vertically mixed waters year-round contrary to the seasonal stratified Eastern Hydrographic Domain (EHD), resulting in the formation of a thermal front between domains. Samples of sediments were collected in spring 2016 and summer 2017 at several locations to analyze the grain-size composition by means of laser diffractometry. A conceptual model of bottom hydrodynamics was inferred based on sediment's grain-size trends. Asymmetric dominant tidal currents affect bottom sediment distribution. A general northward sediment transport is dominant at the WHD, while at the EHD there is a seasonal shift in the transport direction. There, a net northward transport with a counterclockwise gyre dominates bottom hydrodynamics at the end of the thermal front formation, conditioned by residual currents. In contrast, a net southward circulation likely driven by strong westerly winds throughout autumn and winter prevails at the beginning of the water column stratification. The inferred sediment transport suggests a net loss of material that has to be recovered by tidal currents entering through the mouth and coastal sources as runoff, mudslides, and/or aeolian dust.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据