4.7 Article

Buffeting response evaluation of long-span bridges with emphasis on the three-dimensional effects of gusty winds

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 156-172

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.09.057

关键词

Long-span bridge; Gusty wind; Buffeting; Three-dimensional effect; Generalized gust loading model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A generalized gust loading model applicable to the buffeting response predictions of both slender, line-like long-span bridges and bridges with small aspect-ratios (the ratio of the span to the width of a deck) is established based on the three-dimensional (3D) theory. The spectra of the buffeting forces are determined by the equivalent 3D two-wavenumber aerodynamic admittance function (AAF) to deal with the 3D effects of gusty winds. The mode shape influence function is introduced to take into account the three-dimensionality of the modal force. Since the mode shape influence function involves the aspect-ratio term, the three-dimensionality of modal force therefore shows a dependence on the aspect-ratio of the bridge deck. The gust response analysis can easily be conducted in the frequency domain through the use of the generalized gust loading model. Numerical examples of bridges with different aspect-ratios in service states and construction states are performed to evaluate the discrepancies in the buffeting displacements calculated by both the generalized gust loading model and the traditional gust loading model. The results show that the traditional gust loading model can generally be applied to the buffeting analysis of long-span bridges with large aspect-ratios in both the service and construction states. However, for bridges with small aspect-ratios, such as in the construction stages, the traditional gust model may overestimate the buffeting response of a bridge deck to a larger degree (neglecting any end effect), indicating the invalidation of the strip assumption in these cases. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据