4.7 Article

Cytoscape StringApp: Network Analysis and Visualization of Proteomics Data

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 623-632

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00702

关键词

protein networks; STRING database; Cytoscape; network analysis; network visualization; proteomics data; functional enrichment

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF14CC0001]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-4005-00443]
  3. National Institutes of Health [NIGMS P41 GM103504]
  4. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF [2018-183120]
  5. Silicon Valley Community Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein networks have become a popular tool for analyzing and visualizing the often long lists of proteins or genes obtained from proteomics and other high-throughput technologies. One of the most popular sources of such networks is the STRING database, which provides protein networks for more than 2000 organisms, including both physical interactions from experimental data and functional associations from curated pathways, automatic text mining, and prediction methods. However, its web interface is mainly intended for inspection of small networks and their underlying evidence. The Cytoscape software, on the other hand, is much better suited for working with large networks and offers greater flexibility in terms of network analysis, import, and visualization of additional data. To include both resources in the same workflow, we created stringApp, a Cytoscape app that makes it easy to import STRING networks into Cytoscape, retains the appearance and many of the features of STRING, and integrates data from associated databases. Here, we introduce many of the stringApp features and show how they can be used to carry out complex network analysis and visualization tasks on a typical proteomics data set, all through the Cytoscape user interface. stringApp is freely available from the Cytoscape app store: http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/stringapp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据