4.5 Article

Monitoring of quality-relevant and quality-irrelevant blocks with characteristic-similar variables based on self-organizing map and kernel approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 103-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.12.009

关键词

Quality-related process monitoring; Self-organizing map; Kernel partial least squares; Kernel principal component analysis; Block monitoring

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878081]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [222201717006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variables in quality-related process monitoring can be divided into quality-relevant and quality-irrelevant groups depending on the correlation with the quality indicator. These variables can also be separated into multiple sets in which variables are closely relevant to one another because of the interdependence of the process. Block monitoring with reasonable variable partition and reliable model can distinguish quality-related and quality-unrelated faults and improve monitoring performance. A block monitoring method based on self-organizing map (SOM) and kernel approaches is proposed. After collecting and normalizing the sample data including process variables and quality ones, the data matrix is transposed. The inverted samples are used as the input of SOM, and variables with the same behavioral characteristic and a close correlation are topologically mapped in a similar area. Accordingly, samples can be visually blocked into quality-relevant and independent subspaces. Given the nonlinearity of industrial process, kernel partial least squares (KPLS) and kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) are employed to monitor the two types of blocks. The information provided by fault detection can reveal the effects on quality indicators and the location of faults. Finally, the effectiveness of SOM-KPLS/KPCA is evaluated using a numerical example and the Tennessee-Eastman process. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据