4.6 Article

Band-fluctuations model for the fundamental absorption of crystalline and amorphous semiconductors: a dimensionless joint density of states analysis

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaf963

关键词

bandgap; band-fluctuations; fundamental absorption; Urbach

资金

  1. Research Management Office of the Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (DGI-PUCP)
  2. Peruvian National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT) [147-2017]
  3. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  4. FONDECYT [132-2017, 037-2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We develop a band-fluctuations model which describes the absorption coefficient in the fundamental absorption region for direct and indirect electronic transitions in disordered semiconductor materials. The model accurately describes both the Urbach tail and absorption edge regions observed in such materials near the mobility edge in a single equation with only three fitting parameters. An asymptotic analysis leads to the universally observed exponential tail below the bandgap energy and to the absorption edge model at zero Kelvin above it, for either direct or indirect electronic transitions. The latter feature allows the discrimination between the absorption edge and absorption tails, thus yielding more accurate bandgap values when fitting optical absorption data. We examine the general character of the model using a dimensionless joint density of states formalism with a quantitative analysis of a large amount of optical absorption data. Both heavily doped p-type GaAs and nano-crystalline Ga1-xMnxN, as examples for direct bandgap materials, as well as amorphous Si:H-x, SiC:H-x and SiNx, are modeled successfully with this approach. We contrast our model with previously reported empirical models, showing in our case a suitable absorption coefficient shape capable of describing various distinct materials while also maintaining the universality of the exponential absorption tail and absorption edge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据