4.8 Article

Tin-Based Multiple Quantum Well Perovskites for Light-Emitting Diodes with Improved Stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 453-459

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03700

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91733302]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China Fundamental Studies of Perovskite Solar Cells [2015CB932200]
  3. European Union [2016YFE0112000]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171002, BK20150043, BK20150064]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474164, 61634001, 61875084]
  6. Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province of China [16KJB430016]
  7. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [61725502]
  8. Synergetic Innovation Center for Organic Electronics and Information Displays

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tin-based halide perovskites have attracted considerable attention for nontoxic perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), but the easy oxidation of Sn2+ and nonuniform film morphology cause poor device stability and reproducibility. Herein, we report a facile approach to achieve efficient and stable lead-free PeLEDs by using tin based perovskite multiple quantum wells (MQWs) for the first time. On the basis of various spectroscopic investigations, we find that the MQW structure not only facilitates the formation of uniform and highly emissive perovskite films but also suppresses the oxidation of Sn2+ cations. The tin-based MQW PeLED exhibits a peak external quantum efficiency of 3% and a high radiance of 40 W sr(-1) m(-2) with good reproducibility. Significantly, these devices show excellent operational stability with over a 2 h lifetime under a constant current density of 10 mA cm(-2), which is comparable to that of lead-based PeLEDs. These results suggest that perovskite MQWs can provide a promising platform for achieving high-performance lead-free PeLEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据