4.6 Article

Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Designed Photo-Efficient Indoline-Based Dye-Sensitizers with D-A-π-A Framework

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 123, 期 6, 页码 3309-3320

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10708

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-SC0018322]
  2. NSF EPSCoR [OIA-1757220]
  3. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) by National Science Foundation [OCI-1053575]
  4. XSEDE award [DMR110088, DMR110013P]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0018322] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seven D-A-pi-A-based indoline (IND) dyes that were designed via quantitative-structure-property relationship modeling have been comprehensively investigated using computational approaches to evaluate their prospect of application in future dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). An array of optoelectronic properties of the isolated dye and dyes adsorbed on a TiO2 cluster that simulates the semiconductor were explored by density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT methods. Light absorption spectra, vertical dipole moment, shift of the conduction band of semiconductor, excited state lifetime, driving force of electron injection, photostability of the excited state, and exciton binding energy were computed. Our study showed that the presence of an internal acceptor such as pyrido[3,4-b]pyrazine (pyrazine) would influence greater the open circuit voltage (V-OC), compared to the benzothiadiazole moiety. Considering the balance between the V-OC and J(SC) (short circuit current) along with the all calculated characteristics, the IND3, INDS, and IND10 are the most suited among the designed dyes to be used as potential candidates for the photo-efficient DSSCs. The present study provides the results of rational molecular design followed by exploration of photophysical properties to be used as a valuable reference for the synthesis of photo-efficient dyes for DSSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据