4.6 Article

Discrete and Continuum Analyses of Confinement Effects of an Ionic Liquid on the EDL Structure and the Pressure Acting on the Wall

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 2516-2525

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09630

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B05035211]
  2. BK 21 Plus program of Korea
  3. [IBS-R020-D1]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B05035211] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use both molecular dynamics (MD) and continuum models to analyze the electric double layer structure and pressure acting on the wall of a symmetrically valenced ionic liquid in a nanoconfinement. The nanoslit width varies from 20 times ion size to an ion size, in which the Bazant, Storey, and Kornyshev model may not be compatible. However, the comparison with the MD model shows that the continuum model can successfully predict the averaged charge density and decay of the pressure. The continuum model also shows the exact location of the first and second layer of ions from the confinement wall when considering both steric and correlation effects. However, the continuum model does not account for the oscillatory behaviors of the ion density and the pressure due to the typical characteristics of ionic discreteness, and it slightly overestimates the counterion concentrations compared with the MD analysis. In conclusion, the continuum model can be used to estimate the overall tendency of the pressure acting on the wall when ionic liquid is confined in nanometer thickness, though the oscillatory behavior of the pressure, which originates from the discreteness of ions, cannot be predicted exactly. It can provide useful information in designing nanoporous structures for various electrochemical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据