4.5 Article

Dissociation Process of a MDM2/p53 Complex Investigated by Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics and the Markov State Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 123, 期 11, 页码 2469-2478

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b10309

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI [JP25104002, JP15H04357]
  2. MEXT
  3. RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science through the HPCI System Research project [hp150270, hp160207, hp170254, hp180201]
  4. Hitachi Scholarship Program of the Hitachi Global Foundation [S175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we efficiently generated dissociation pathways of a protein-ligand complex without applying force bias with parallel cascade selection molecular dynamics (PaCS-MD) and showed that PaCS-MD in combination with the Markov state model (MSM) yielded a binding free energy comparable to experimental values. In this work, we applied the same procedure to a complex of MDM2 protein and the transactivation domain of p53 protein (TAD-p53), the latter of which is known to be very flexible in the unbound state. Using 30 independent MD simulations in PaCS-MD, we successfully generated 25 dissociation pathways of the complex, which showed complete or partial unfolding of the helical region of TAD-p53 during the dissociation process within an average simulation time of 154.8 +/- 46.4 ns. The standard binding free energy obtained in combination with one-dimensional-, three-dimensional (3D)- or C-alpha-MSM was in good agreement with those determined experimentally. Using 3D-MSM based on the center of mass position of TAD-p53 relative to MDM2, the dissociation rate constant was calculated, which was comparable to those measured experimentally. C-alpha-MSM based on all C-alpha coordinates of TAD-p53 reproduced the experimentally measured standard binding free energy, and dissociation and association rate constants. We conclude that the combination of PaCS-MD and MSM offers an efficient computational procedure to calculate binding free energies and kinetic rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据