4.6 Article

Interaction between Acetic Acid and Glycerol: A Model for Secondary Reactions during Holocellulose Pyrolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 123, 期 3, 页码 674-681

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b11264

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576064, 51821004]
  2. Beijing Nova Program [Z171100001117064]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3172030]
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [161051]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016YQ05, 2018QN057, 2018ZD08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pyrolysis of holocellulose, secondary reactions of the primary pyrolytic products inevitably occur, affecting the final pyrolytic product distribution. Carboxylic acids from primary pyrolysis process have significant interaction effects on both holocellulose and its pyrolytic products, whereas, the interaction mechanisms are still unclear. In the present study, acetic acid is selected as the typical carboxylic acid product, and glycerol is selected to represent the various hydroxyl-based compounds (both holocellulose and pyrolytic products such as anhydrosugars, etc.). The density functional theory (DFT) method is adopted to investigate the interaction mechanisms between them. Calculation results indicate that acetic acid and glycerol have strong interactions, with acetic acid acting as a catalyst for these interactions in two patterns. (I) Acetic acid enhances the dehydration reactions of glycerol with low energy barriers. (II) Acetic acid and glycerol undergo esterification to form an ester intermediate which then decomposes via various reactions. In addition, the decomposition of acetic acid can also be promoted by the catalysis of glycerol in a certain degree. This study reveals the basic interaction mechanisms between carboxylic acids and hydroxyl-based compounds, providing fundamental information to understand the secondary reactions during pyrolysis of holocellulose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据