4.6 Article

Intramolecular Hydrogen Shift Chemistry of Hydroperoxy-Substituted Peroxy Radicals

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 590-600

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09745

关键词

-

资金

  1. Camille and Henry Dreyfus postdoctoral program in Environmental Chemistry
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1508526]
  3. University of Copenhagen
  4. Danish Center for Scientific Computing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas-phase autoxidation - the sequential regeneration of peroxy radicals (RO2) via intramolecular hydrogen shifts (H-shifts) followed by oxygen addition - leads to the formation of organic hydroperoxides. The atmospheric fate of these peroxides remains unclear, including the potential for further H-shift chemistry. Here, we report H-shift rate coefficients for a system of RO2 with hydroperoxide functionality produced in the OH-initiated oxidation of 2-hydroperoxy-2-methylpentane. The initial RO2 formed in this chemistry are unable to undergo alpha-OOH H-shift (HOOC-H) reactions. However, these RO2 rapidly isomerize (>100 s(-1) at 296 K) by H-shift of the hydroperoxy hydrogen (ROO-H) to produce a hydroperoxy-substituted RO2 with an accessible alpha-OOH hydrogen. First order rate coefficients for the 1,5 H-shift of the alpha-OOH hydrogen are measured to be similar to 0.04 s(-1) (296 K) and similar to 0.1 s(-1) (318 K), within 50% of the rate coefficients calculated using multiconformer transition state theory. Reaction of the RO2 with NO produces alkoxy radicals which also undergo rapid isomerization via 1,6 and 1,5 H-shift of the hydroperoxy hydrogen (ROO-H) to produce RO2 with alcohol functionality. One of these hydroxy-substituted RO2 exhibits a 1,5 alpha-OH (HOC-H) H-shift, measured to be similar to 0.2 s(-1) (296 K) and similar to 0.6 s(-1) (318 K), again in agreement with the calculated rates. Thus, the rapid shift of hydroperoxy hydrogens in alkoxy and peroxy radicals enables intramolecular reactions that would otherwise be inaccessible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据