4.5 Article

Empagliflozin, an SGLT2 Inhibitor, Reduced the Mortality Rate after Acute Myocardial Infarction with Modification of Cardiac Metabolomes and Antioxidants in Diabetic Rats

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.118.253666

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Sapporo Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism by which SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiac events in diabetic patients remains unclear. Here, we examined the effects of an SGLT2 inhibitor on the acute survival rate after myocardial infarction (MI) in an animal model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and the possible involvement of modification of cardiac metabolomes and antioxidative proteins. MI was induced in DM Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats and Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) control rats. Treatment with empagliflozin (10 mg/kg per day, 14 days) before MI reduced blood glucose and increased blood and myocardial beta-hydroxybutyrate (beta OHB) levels in OLETF. Survival rate at 48 hours after MI was significantly lower in OLETF rats than in LETO rats (40% vs. 84%), and empagliflozin significantly improved the survival rate in OLETF rats to 70%, although the sizes of MI were comparable. Patterns of metabolomes and gene expression in the noninfarcted myocardium of OLETF rats were consistent with increased fatty acid oxidation and decreased glucose oxidation. The patterns were modified by empagliflozin, suggesting both increased glucose oxidation and ketone utilization in OLETF rats. Empagliflozin prevented reduction of ATP level in the noninfarcted myocardium after MI and significantly increased myocardial levels of Sirt3 and superoxide dismutase 2 in OLETF rats. Administration of beta OHB partially mimicked the effects of empagliflozin in OLETF rats. The results suggest that empagliflozin prevents DM-induced increase in post-MI mortality, possibly by protective modification of cardiac energy metabolism and antioxidant proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据