4.5 Review

Pediatric Oral Formulations: An Updated Review of Commercially Available Pediatric Oral Formulations Since 2007

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 1335-1365

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.013

关键词

formulation; oral drug delivery; pediatric; excipient(s)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral pediatric formulations are either ready-to-use or require manipulation and multiuse or single-use. Strong encouragement for preservative-free pediatric formulations has resulted in fewer multiuse solutions or suspensions in favor of single-use solid oral dosage forms. This updated review covering new pediatric formulations marketed in the United States of America, Europe, and Japan spanning the years 2007 to mid-2018 identified 16 types of pediatric oral formulations of which 7 are ready-to-use and 9 require manipulation, and 51 total new pediatric oral formulations of which 21 are ready-to-use and 30 require manipulation. Ready-to-use formulations include oral solution, oral suspension, oral soluble film, tablet, scored tablets, orally disintegrating tablet, chewable tablet, and mini-tablets. Formulations requiring manipulation include sprinkle capsule, powder for oral solution, powder for oral suspension, granules for oral suspension, oral powder, oral granules, tablet, dispersible tablet, dispersible scored tablet, tablet for oral suspension, and mini-tablets (oral granules). Significant advances in packaging technology include filling mini-tablets, granules, or powders into sachets, stick packets, blisters, and 2-piece capsules. The future of pediatric oral formulations will increasingly be with user-friendly, preservative-free, taste-masked formulations including multiparticulate single-use solid dosage forms including mini-tablets, orally disintegrating tablets, and sprinkle capsules with or without a specialized package configuration. (c) 2019 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据