4.5 Article

Modulation of Intestinal Transport and Absorption of Topotecan, a BCRP Substrate, by Various Pharmaceutical Excipients and Their Inhibitory Mechanisms of BCRP Transporter

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 1315-1325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.043

关键词

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter(s); breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP); Caco-2 cells; efflux pumps; excipient; intestinal transport; intestinal absorption

资金

  1. Otsuka Toshimi Scholarship Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer resistance protein transporter (ABCG2/BCRP) is highly expressed on the intestinal epithelial membrane and has a significant impact on the oral absorption of topotecan. In this study, we examined 6 pharmaceutical excipients including BL-9EX, Brij97, Cremophor EL, Labrasol, Pluronic F68, and Tween 20 for their BCRP inhibitory effects. A bidirectional transport study using Caco-2 cells demonstrated that Tween 20 and Cremophor EL significantly increased the absorptive transport of topotecan, while simultaneously decreasing secretory transport. Interestingly, Labrasol selectively increased absorptive transport, whereas Pluronic F68 selectively decreased the secretory transport, of topotecan. Further investigation using an in situ closed loop experiment showed that 0.05% (w/v) Tween 20 and Cremophor EL significantly increased the intestinal absorption of topotecan in rats. An LDH assay demonstrated that 0.05% (w/v) Tween 20 and Cremophor EL did not cause significant damage to intestinal epithelial membranes. Furthermore, we examined the absorption-enhancing mechanisms of these excipients and found that Cremophor EL, Tween 20, and Labrasol increased the membrane fluidity of the inner lipid bilayers of the intestine. Therefore, this might be one of the most important mechanisms for inhibition of BCRP function by these excipients in the intestine. (c) 2019 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据