4.5 Article

Orthogonal Redundant Monitoring of a New Continuous Fluid-Bed Dryer for Pharmaceutical Processing by Means of Mass and Energy Balance Calculations and Spectroscopic Techniques

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 2041-2055

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.12.028

关键词

mass and energy balance; PAT; glatt GPCG2 CM; continuous fluid-bed drying; continuous manufacturing; process control; orthogonal process control; NIR spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In line with the ongoing shift from batch to continuous pharmaceutical production of solid oral dosage forms, a novel continuous fluid-bed dryer was developed. The forced feed nature of the Glatt GPCG2 CM fluid-bed dryer allows continuous, first-in-first-out drying of wet granulate materials based on its compartmentalized, rotating fluidizing chamber. The presented work aims to introduce the dryer's functionalities in detail, and to demonstrate that the rotating fluid-bed chambers facilitates a stable drying behavior, which ensures robust and repeatable residual moisture contents (loss-on-drying [LOD]) of the discharged granules. Furthermore, a mass and energy balance (MEB) is derived, based on the logged process values of the granulating and drying units. Two independent test experiments demonstrate that precise LOD prediction in real time is achievable by MEB to serve as an orthogonal process analytical technology method to common near-infrared spectroscopy. On average, MEB results differed by 0.36% LOD (absolute) from offline reference analyses, and by 0.61% LOD from predictions made with an in-house available near-infrared spectroscopy method. Furthermore, good correlation between the observed and expected thermal energy loss was found. The derived MEB is solely based on physical principles; hence it is product independent and transferable to other materials that are processed on the described equipment. (C) 2019 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据