4.2 Article

International, multicentre, observational study of fluid bolus therapy in neonates

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 632-639

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14260

关键词

blood pressure; fluid; infant; newborn; therapy

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  2. Royal Australasian College of Physicians Foundation
  3. Women's and Children's Hospital Foundation
  4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To assess the prevalence, types and indications for fluid bolus therapy in neonates with haemodynamic compromise. Methods This was a pragmatic, international, multicentre observational study in neonatal units across Australasia, Europe and North America with a predefined study period of 10-15 study days per participating neonatal unit between December 2015 and March 2017. Infants <= 28 days of age who received a fluid bolus for the management of haemodynamic compromise (>= 10 mL/kg given at <= 6 h) were included. Results A total of 163 neonates received a bolus over 8479 eligible patient days in 41 neonatal units. Prevalence of fluid bolus therapy varied between centres from 0 to 28.6% of admitted neonates per day, with a pooled prevalence rate of 1.5% (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.9%). The most common fluid used was 0.9% sodium chloride (129/163; 79%), and the volume of fluid administered was most commonly 10 mL/kg (115/163; 71%) over a median of 30 min (interquartile range 20-60). The most frequent indications were hypotension (n = 56; 34%), poor perfusion (n = 20; 12%) and metabolic acidosis (n = 20; 12%). Minimal or no clinical improvement was reported by clinicians in 66 of 163 cases (40%). Conclusions Wide international variations in types, indications and effects of fluid bolus administration in haemodynamically compromised neonates suggest uncertainty in the risk-benefit profile. This is likely to reflect the lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of different fluid types, doses and appropriate indications. Together, these highlight a need for further clinically relevant studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据