4.7 Article

Peripheral CD19+ B-cell counts and infusion intervals as a surrogate for long-term B-cell depleting therapy in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 266, 期 1, 页码 57-67

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-9092-4

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Neuromyelitis optica; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; Monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody; CD19(+) B-cell counts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundWith ocrelizumab another drug is available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Little is known on the long-term use of ocrelizumab on immune cell subsets, and no surrogate markers are available. Rituximab (RTX) has been in off-label use for the treatment of MS, neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) for >10years.ObjectiveWe evaluated the long-term depletion and repopulation rate of peripheral CD19(+) B-cells as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome, and whether it may serve for dosage and time-to-infusion decision making.MethodsWe evaluated the CD19(+) and CD4(+)/8(+) T-cell counts in n=153 patients treated with RTX (132 MS, 21 NMO/NMOSD). The dosages ranged from 250 to 2000mg RTX. Depletion/repopulation rates of CD19(+) B-cells as well as long-term total lymphocyte cell counts, were assessed and corroborated with EDSS, ARR (annualized relapse rate), MRI, and time to reinfusion.ResultsCD19(+) B-cells' repopulation rate significantly varied depending on the dosage applied leading to individualized application intervals (mean 9.730.528 months). Low/absent CD19(+) B-cell counts were associated with reduced ARR, EDSS, and GD(+)-MRI-lesions. Long-term B-cell-depleting therapy led to a transiently skewed CD4(+)/8(+) T-cell ratio due to reduced CD4(+) T-cells and absolute lymphocyte counts, which recovered after the second cycle.Conclusion p id=Par5 Our data suggest that CD19(+) B-cell repopulation latency may serve as surrogate marker for individualized treatment strategies in MS and NMO/NMOSD, which proved clinically equally effective in our cohort as evaluated by previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据