4.6 Article

Investigation of potential anti-malarial lead candidate 2-(4-fluorobenzylthio)-5-(5-bromothiophen-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole: Insights from crystal structure, DFT, QTAIM and hybrid QM/MM binding energy analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1175, 期 -, 页码 230-240

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.07.102

关键词

Oxadiazole; Thiophene; Hetero-halogen contact; DHFR; Anti-malarial; Hybrid QM/MM

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University through the Research Group Program [RGP-1438-0010]
  2. DST-SERB [SB/YS/LS-19/2014]
  3. Prof. TRR grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combined study involving single crystal X-ray diffraction and various theoretical approaches has been used to characterize the 2-(4-fluorobenzylthio)-5-(5-bromothiophen-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole compound. The crystal structure is primarily stabilized by intermolecular C-H center dot center dot center dot pi, C-H center dot center dot center dot N and C-H center dot center dot center dot F. A short and very rare halogen-halogen contact (Br center dot center dot center dot F) which adopts type I trans geometry along with the S center dot center dot center dot S, N center dot center dot center dot S contacts, which play an important role in the stabilization of the crystal packing. The importance of these contacts is established through various theoretical approaches such as QTAIM and NBO analysis. A detailed CSD analysis of Br center dot center dot center dot F contacts is performed to understand the geometrical preference. A detailed in silico analysis is performed to explore the binding potential of the title compound against the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (PfDHER). The results clearly suggest that the title compound may be a promising anti-malarial lead candidate by inhibiting the DHFR target and halogenated fragments of the molecule are important for the stabilization of the protein-ligand complex formation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据