4.7 Article

Structure-Based Engineering of Irreversible Inhibitors against Histone Lysine Demethylase KDM5A

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 23, 页码 10588-10601

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01219

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), under NCI Chemical Biology Consortium [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. NIH [GM114306, 1S10OD012304-01, P30CA016672]
  3. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RR160029]
  4. CPRIT [RP130397]
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [ZIATR000369] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM114306] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The active sites of hundreds of human alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha KG) and Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases are exceedingly well preserved, which challenges the design of selective inhibitors. We identified a noncatalytic cysteine (Cys481 in KDMSA) near the active sites of KDMS histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases, which is absent in other histone demethylase families, that could be explored for interaction with the cysteine-reactive electrophile acrylamide. We synthesized analogs of a thienopyridine-based inhibitor chemotype, namely, 2-((3-aminophenyl)(2-(piperidin-1-y)ethoxy)methyl)thieno[3,2-b]pyridine-7-carboxylic acid (N70) and a derivative containing a (dimethylamino)but-2-enamido)phenyl moiety (N71) designed to form a covalent interaction with Cys481. We characterized the inhibitory and binding activities against KDMSA and determined the cocrystal structures of the catalytic domain of KDMSA in complex with N70 and N71. Whereas the noncovalent inhibitor N70 displayed alpha KG-competitive inhibition that could be reversed after dialysis, inhibition by N71 was dependent on enzyme concentration and persisted even after dialysis, consistent with covalent modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据