4.5 Article

Longitudinal evaluation of SMN levels as biomarker for spinal muscular atrophy: results of a phase IIb double-blind study of salbutamol

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 293-300

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105482

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) [FARM79AJ8P]
  2. Telethon Italia [GGP12116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder, due to the loss of function of the survival motor neuron (SMN1) gene. The first treatment for the condition, recently approved, is based on the reduction of exon 7 skipping in mRNAs produced by a highly homologous gene (SMN2). The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the applicability of the dosage of SMN gene produts in blood, as biomarker for SMA, and the safety of oral salbutamol, a beta2-adrenergic agonist modulating SMN2 levels. Methods We have performed a 1-year multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with salbutamol in 45 adult patients with SMA. Patients assumed 4 mg of salbutamol or placebo/three times a day. Molecular tests were SMN2 copy number, SMN transcript and protein levels. We have also explored the clinical effect, by the outcome measures available at the time of study design. Results T hirty-six patients completed the study. Salbutamol was safe and well tolerated. We observed a significant and progressive increase in SMN2 full-length levels in peripheral blood of the salbutamol-treated patients (p<0.00001). The exploratory analysis of motor function showed an improvement in most patients. Conclusions Our data demonstrate safety and molecular efficacy of salbutamol. We provide the first longitudinal evaluation of SMN levels (both transcripts and protein) in placebo and in response to a compound modulating the gene expression: SMN transcript dosage in peripheral blood is reliable and may be used as pharmacodynamic marker in clinical trials with systemic compounds modifying SMN2levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据