4.6 Article

Investigation of local atomic structure of Ni doped SnO2 thin films via X-ray absorption spectroscopy and their magnetic properties

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-018-0345-x

关键词

SnO2 thin film; Defects; Synchrotron XRD; XANES spectra; Magnetism

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi [YSS/2015/001262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured Ni (10at.%) doped SnO2 thin films were grown on Si (100) substrate via pulsed laser deposition technique in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) chamber and oxygen partial pressure (Po-2) environment. The influence of UHV and Po-2 growth conditions on the ferromagnetic (FM) ordering, electronic states and short-range structure around Ni ions embedded in the SnO2 network has been investigated. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction results revealed the single-phase nature of SnO2 rutile structure without any foreign peak, and the mean crystallite sizes < D > were found to be 12 and 25nm for UHV and Po-2 deposited films respectively. The crystal growth in UHV chamber, introduced deliberately the oxygen vacancy (Vo) and reduced partially the valence state of Sn4+ (SnO2) ions to Sn3+ (Sn2O3), whereas the Po-2 environment optimized the crystallinity and enhanced the oxygen stoichiometry (O:Sn=2:1) by healing the oxygen vacancies. These details have been obtained by means of Raman spectra, near edge X-ray absorption fine structure at Ni L-3,L-2, O K edges and XANES spectra at Ni K edge. The films showed FM response and the saturation moments increase clearly from 4.4 emu/cm(3) (0.33 mu(B)/Ni) for Po-2 deposited film to 5.9 emu/cm(3) (0.45 mu(B)/Ni) for the film grown in UHV condition. Hence, the enhanced magnetization in UHV condition gives clear evidence on the importance of oxygen vacancies to activate the FM ordering. The role of Vo(2+), in the first-shell of oxygen coordination around Sn/Ni ions, to achieve the FM response has been discussed on the basis of bound magnetic polaron and charge transfer percolation mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据