4.7 Review

State of the art: Evaluation and prognostication of myocarditis using cardiac MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 E122-E131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26611

关键词

myocarditis; cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; Lake Louise Criteria; T1 mapping; parametric mapping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myocarditis encompasses both primary and secondary processes causing inflammation of the myocardium. Viral infections are a common secondary cause of myocarditis with important clinical relevance. Viral myocarditis has a varied clinical presentation, potentially resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Acutely, systolic dysfunction and sudden cardiac death may ensue; chronically, myocarditis may result in a dilated cardiomyopathy requiring heart transplantation. Myocarditis is thought to be one of the most common causes of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), with important consequences for cardiovascular outcomes. Patients with myocarditis are currently underdiagnosed. Cardiac MRI has evolved as the noninvasive test of choice, with cardiac MRI-specific diagnostic requirements defined in the Lake Louise Criteria (LLC). Detecting the presence of tissue edema, hyperemia, and necrosis in both acute and chronic stages form the foundation of the LLC. Cardiac MR for chronic myocarditis (greater than 8 weeks from symptom onset) has decreased sensitivity for diagnosis. Emerging sequences such as T-1 and T-2 parametric maps provide tissue characterization regarding inflammation without reliance on reference tissue, overcoming limitations of the LLC. Beyond diagnostic criteria, these imaging techniques have proven useful in further characterizing the diseased tissue, prognostication, and clinical decision-making. This review describes the utility and evolving use of cardiac MRI in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1061-1071.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据