4.4 Article

AWML: adaptive weighted margin learning for knowledge graph embedding

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 167-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-018-0535-2

关键词

Knowledge graph; Knowledge representation learning; Adaptive margin; Adaptive importance weight

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61602048, 61601046, 61520106007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge representation learning (KRL), exploited by various applications such as question answering and information retrieval, aims to embed the entities and relations contained by the knowledge graph into points of a vector space such that the semantic and structure information of the graph is well preserved in the representing space. However, the previous works mainly learned the embedding representations by treating each entity and relation equally which tends to ignore the inherent imbalance and heterogeneous properties existing in knowledge graph. By visualizing the representation results obtained from classic algorithm TransE in detail, we reveal the disadvantages caused by this homogeneous learning strategy and gain insight of designing policy for the homogeneous representation learning. In this paper, we propose a novel margin-based pairwise representation learning framework to be incorporated into many KRL approaches, with the method of introducing adaptivity according to the degree of knowledge heterogeneity. More specially, an adaptive margin appropriate to separate the real samples from fake samples in the embedding space is first proposed based on the sample's distribution density, and then an adaptive weight is suggested to explicitly address the trade-off between the different contributions coming from the real and fake samples respectively. The experiments show that our Adaptive Weighted Margin Learning (AWML) framework can help the previous work achieve a better performance on real-world Knowledge Graphs Freebase and WordNet in the tasks of both link prediction and triplet classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据