4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

A study on plant recognition using conventional image processing and deep learning approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 1997-2004

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-169911

关键词

Plant species recognition; deep learning; convolutional neural network; machine learning classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant species recognition from images or videos is challenging due to a large diversity of plants, variation in orientation, viewpoint, background clutter, etc. In this paper, plant species recognition is carried out using two approaches, namely, traditional method and deep learning approach. In traditional method, feature extraction is carried out using Hu moments (shape features), Haralick texture, local binary pattern (LBP) (texture features) and color channel statistics (color features). The extracted features are classified using different classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, classification and regression tree, naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, random forest and bagging classifier). Also, different deep learning architectures are tested in the context of plant species recognition. Three standard datasets (Folio, Swedish leaf and Flavia) and one real-time dataset (Leaf12) is used. It is observed that, in traditional method, feature vector obtained by the combination of color channel statistics+LBP+Hu+Haralick with Random Forest classifier for Leaf12 dataset resulted in a plant recognition accuracy (rank-1) of 82.38%. VGG 16 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture with logistic regression resulted in an accuracy of 97.14% for Leaf12 dataset. An accuracy of 96.53%, 96.25% and 99.41% is obtained for Folio, Flavia and Swedish leaf datasets using VGG 19 CNN architecture with logistic regression as a classifier. It is also observed that the VGG (Very large Convolutional Neural Network) CNN models provided a higher accuracy rate compared to traditional methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据