4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Habitat quality determines patch occupancy of two specialist Lepidoptera species in well-connected grasslands

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 247-258

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-018-0109-1

关键词

Adscita statices; Erebia medusa; Functional connectivity; Habitat fragmentation; Landscape composition; Vegetation structure

资金

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU
  2. German Federal Environmental Foundation) [Az.: 30350-33/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past 150 years, semi-natural grasslands have suffered from either large-scale intensification of land use or abandonment. Lepidoptera are excellent model organisms to study the effects of land-use changes. In this study, we analysed the effects of landscape quality and habitat quality on the patch occupancy of twospecialist Lepidoptera species, the butterfly Erebia medusa and the burnet moth Adscita statices, in small but well-connected semi-natural grasslands (N=71) in central Germany. Our study revealed that habitat quality was the main driver of patch occupancy of the two species. The generalized linear model analysis revealed that the occurrence of both species was determined by the litter volume. Additionally, for A. statices the cover of the host plants (Rumex acetosella and R. acetosa) was a further predictor. In contrast, landscape quality had only a minor role on patch occupancy. For both species, the observed population structure resembled a classical metapopulation of the Levins type consisting of many small and highly connected patches. In the short and medium term, abandonment was beneficial for both species, as it maintained the litter layer. In the long run it would lead to vegetation dominated by competitive, high-growing grasses (e.g., Arrhenatherum elatius) and a decreasing cover of the less competitive host plants, especially Festuca ovina agg. and R. acetosella. Hence, we would recommend rotational grazing or mowing, if sufficiently large parts of the habitats were not under management every year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据