4.5 Article

Effect of Composition on Waterproofing Property of Silicone Modified Polyacrylate Emulsion-Sulphoaluminate Cement Composite Coating: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10904-018-1013-6

关键词

Polymer; Sulphoaluminate cement; Coating; Water absorption; RSM

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFB0303505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51602126, 51672108]
  3. University of Jinan Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622118, XBH1716]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology) [SYSJJ2018-12]
  5. 111 Project of International Corporation on Advanced Cement-based Materials [D17001]
  6. University of Jinan Doctoral Foundation and Scientific Planning Project [XBS1661, XKY1730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer-modified cementitious coatings are considered to be one of the most promising waterproofing materials. In this paper, response surface methodology (RSM) is used to optimize composition of silicone modified polyacrylate emulsion (SPA)-sulphoaluminate cement (SAC) composite coating (SSCC) based on improvement of waterproofing property. Being considered as the most important factors, the ratios of SAC to SPA, REP (redispersion emulsion powder) to SPA and SiO2 to SPA are studied. The results show that the quadratic polynomial model fits experiment data fairly well, and R-2 and Adj-R-2 values for water absorption are 0.9852 and 0.9662, respectively. The differences observed from variation of SAC/SPA and REP/SPA are extremely significant. The water absorption of SSCC decreases first and increases afterwards with increasing the ratio of SAC to SPA. And a trend caused by REP/SPA is gradually decreasing. By contrast, the factor of SiO2/SPA is not that significant. The optimal ranges, taken all factors into consideration, are 0.8-1.0 for SAC/SPA, 0.10-0.11 for REP/SPA and 1.1-1.3 for SiO2/SPA. In this case, the water absorption ratio can drop to 4.25%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据