4.7 Article

Comparative Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Ugandan Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 219, 期 7, 页码 1112-1120

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy637

关键词

Treatment efficacy; malaria; artemether-lumefantrine; dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; Uganda

资金

  1. World Bank, via the AFCC2/RI-East African Public Health Laboratory Networking Project [P111556]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In Uganda, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) showed excellent treatment efficacy for uncomplicated malaria in prior trials. Because the frequency of resistance to artemisinins and piperaquine is increasing in Southeast Asia and the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum polymorphisms associated with resistance has changed, we reassessed treatment efficacies at 3 sites in Uganda. Methods. For this randomized, single-blinded clinical trial, children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were assigned treatment with AL or DHA-PQ and followed for 42 days. Primary end points were risks of recurrent parasitemia, either unadjusted or adjusted to distinguish recrudescence from new infection. We assessed selection by study regimens of relevant P. falciparum genetic polymorphisms associated with drug resistance. Results. Of 599 patients enrolled, 578 completed follow-up. There were no early treatment failures. The risk of recurrent parasitemia was lower with DHA-PQ as compared to AL at all 3 sites at 42 days (26.0% vs 47.0%; P < .001). Recrudescent infections were uncommon in both the DHA-PQ and AL arms (1.1% and 2.2%, respectively; P = .25). Neither regimen selected for pfcrt or pfmdr1 polymorphisms associated with drug resistance. Conclusions. AL and DHA-PQ remain effective for the treatment of malaria in Uganda. Neither regimen selected for genetic polymorphisms associated with drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据