4.7 Review

Comparative Immunogenicity of Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 219, 期 10, 页码 1525-1535

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy720

关键词

Immunogenicity; influenza; vaccine

资金

  1. Theme-based Research Scheme of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong [T11-705/14N]
  2. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1U01IP001064]
  3. University of Hong Kong [1U01IP001064]
  4. Harvard Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U54 GM088558]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A number of enhanced influenza vaccines have been developed for use in older adults, including high-dose, MF59-adjuvanted, and intradermal vaccines. Methods. We conducted a systematic review examining the improvements in antibody responses measured by the hemagglutination inhibition assay associated with these enhanced vaccines, compared with each other and with the standard-dose (SD) vaccine using random effects models. Results. Thirty-nine trials were included. Compared with adults aged >= 60 years receiving SD vaccines, those receiving enhanced vaccines had significantly higher postvaccination titers (for all vaccine strains) and higher proportions with elevated titers >= 40 (for most vaccine strains). High-dose vaccine elicited 82% higher postvaccination titer to A(H3N2) compared with SD vaccine; this was significantly higher than the 52% estimated for MF59-adjuvanted versus SD vaccines (P = .04), which was higher than the 32% estimated for intradermal versus SD vaccines (P < .01). Conclusions. Overall, by summarizing current evidence, we found that enhanced vaccines had greater antibody responses than the SD vaccine. Indications of differences among enhanced vaccines highlight the fact that further research is needed to compare new vaccine options, especially during seasons with mismatched circulating strains and for immune outcomes other than hemagglutination inhibition titers as well as vaccine efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据