4.2 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions for chronic noncancer pain

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 198-225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12601

关键词

chronic pain; dietary intake; supplements

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. Rainbow Foundation Top Up Scholarship through the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI)
  3. University of Newcastle International Postgraduate Research Scholarships
  4. Barker PhD Top Up Scholarship
  5. Emlyn and Jennie Thomas Postgraduate Medical Research Scholarship through HMRI
  6. University of Newcastle Faculty of Health and Medicine Early Career Brawn Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of nutrition interventions on participant reported pain severity and intensity in populations with chronic pain. Methods Eight databases were systematically searched for studies that included adult populations with a chronic pain condition, a nutrition intervention and a measure of pain. Where possible, data were pooled using meta-analysis. Seventy-one studies were included, with 23 being eligible for meta-analysis. Results Studies were categorised into four groups: (i) altered overall diet with 12 of 16 studies finding a significant reduction in participant reported pain; (ii) altered specific nutrients with two of five studies reporting a significant reduction in participant reported pain; (iii) supplement-based interventions with 11 of 46 studies showing a significant reduction in pain; and (iv) fasting therapy with one of four studies reporting a significant reduction in pain. The meta-analysis found that, overall, nutrition interventions had a significant effect on pain reduction with studies testing an altered overall diet or just one nutrient having the greatest effect. Conclusions This review highlights the importance and effectiveness of nutrition interventions for people who experience chronic pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据