4.2 Article

The impact of routine follow-up with health care teams on blood pressure control among patients with hypertension

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 466-474

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41371-018-0158-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5 U19 GH 000636]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of guidelines concerning hypertension emphasize the importance of follow-up in patients' management. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of routine follow-up on blood pressure (BP) control. A total of 1511 patients with hypertension aged >= 35 years were selected randomly from 17 communities in two cities and four townships located in Shandong and Jiangsu provinces in China. About half of the patients visited the community clinic four or more times yearly; follow-up was conducted by telephone for 43.3%. Forty-four point two percent of patients who did not visit a community clinic received telephonic follow-up; a higher percentage of telephonic follow-up was found in patients who visited community clinics frequently. Positive changes in BP level and BP control were associated with the number of clinical visits, while no significant correlations were found with telephonic follow-up. After adjustment for covariates, a higher number of clinic visits was associated with better BP control, with odds ratios of 1.628 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.141-2.322), 1.472 (95% CI: 1.008-2.271), and 1.790 (95% CI: 1.154-2.778) for 4-6, 7-12, and >12 visits/year, respectively Taking an antihypertensive drug showed a strong, positive association with the number of clinic visits (OR 1.747, 95% CI: 1.484-2.056). These data suggest that health care systems may achieve greater success by increasing the frequency of clinical visits and that the positive changes may be related to improvement in medication adherence. Routine follow-up by telephone was not significantly associated with BP level and BP control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据