4.7 Article

Predictive factors of the treatment outcome in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 281-290

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-018-1518-3

关键词

Biliary tract cancer; Prognostic factor; Validation; Chemotherapy; Gemcitabine and cisplatin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundFew studies have clearly identified the prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) which is acknowledged as standard chemotherapy regimen.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of the overall survival (OS) in advanced BTC patients receiving GC therapy.MethodsData of 307 patients with advanced BTC who received GC therapy as the first-line chemotherapy at our institution from January 2007 to June 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to the investigation or the validation dataset at the ratio of 2:1. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify the prognostic factors, a prognostic index is proposed from the investigation dataset, and the usefulness of this index was confirmed in the validation dataset.ResultsMultivariate analysis identified poor performance status, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as independent unfavorable predictors. The patients could be classified into three groups according to these factors, and it was found that the outcomes differed significantly among the three groups (P=0.0002, good- vs. intermediate-prognosis groups; P=0.005, intermediate- vs. poor-prognosis groups). When this index was applied to the validation dataset, the OS was confirmed to differ significantly among the three groups (P=0.04, good- vs. intermediate-prognosis groups, P<0.0001, intermediate- vs. poor-prognosis groups).ConclusionsWe identified three predictors of the OS in patients with advanced BTC receiving GC therapy in this study, based on which we could classify the patients into three risk groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据