4.6 Article

The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1498-1505

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.016

关键词

Cardiac implantable electronic device; magnetic resonance imaging; safety; adverse effects; specific absorption rate; isocenter; artifact

资金

  1. B. Braun Medical
  2. Guerbet Group
  3. Siemens Medical Solutions
  4. Inspired Opinions
  5. Orman Guidance Research
  6. Biosense Webster
  7. Biotronik
  8. Medtronic
  9. BioPharm Communications
  10. Boston Scientific
  11. General Electric
  12. Pfizer
  13. WebMD
  14. St. Jude Medical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale and Objectives: Studies reporting the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) have mostly excluded examinations with the device in the magnet isocenter. The purpose of this study was to describe the safety of cardiac and thoracic spine MRI in patients with a CIED. Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients with a CIED who underwent a cardiac or thoracic spine MRI between January 2011 and December 2014 were reviewed. Devices were interrogated before and after imaging with reprogramming to asynchronous pacing in pacemaker dependent patients. The clinical interpretability of the MRI and peak and average specific absorption rates (SARs, W/kg) achieved were determined. Results: Fifty-eight patients underwent 51 cardiac and 11 thoracic spine MRI exams. Twenty-nine patients had a pacemaker and 29 had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Seventeen percent (n = 10) were pacemaker dependent. Fifty-one patients (89%) had non-MRI-conditional devices. There were no clinically significant changes in atrial and ventricular sensing, impedance, and threshold measurements. There were no episodes of device mode changes, arrhythmias, therapies delivered, electrical reset, or battery depletion. One study was prematurely discontinued due to a patient complaint of chest pain of which the etiology was not determined. Across all examinations, the average peak SAR was 2.0 +/- 0.85 W/kg with an average SAR of 0.35 +/- 0.37 W/kg. Artifact significantly limiting the clinical interpretation of the study was present in 33% of cardiac MRI studies. Conclusions: When a comprehensive CIED magnetic resonance safety protocol is followed, the risk of performing 1.5-T magnetic resonance studies with the device in the magnet isocenter, including in patients who are pacemaker dependent, is low.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据