4.6 Article

Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers

期刊

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 537-558

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.004

关键词

Analytical observational studies; descriptive observational studies; diagnostic studies; economic evaluations; experimental studies; health informatics; health services research reporting guidelines; mixed methods studies; prognostic studies; qualitative research; quality improvement studies; radiology research; reliability and agreement studies; statistical analyses and methods; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; study protocols

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior articles have reviewed reporting guidelines and study evaluation tools for clinical research. However, only some of the many available accepted reporting guidelines at the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network have been discussed in previous reports. In this paper, we review the key Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research reporting guidelines that have not been previously discussed. The study types include diagnostic and prognostic studies, reliability and agreement studies, observational studies, analytical and descriptive, experimental studies, quality improvement studies, qualitative research, health informatics, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, economic evaluations, and mixed methods studies. There are also sections on study protocols, and statistical analyses and methods. In each section, there is a brief overview of the study type, and then the reporting guideline(s) that are most applicable to radiology researchers including radiologists involved in health services research are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据