4.4 Review

The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD AND DRUG ANALYSIS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 1-21

出版社

DIGITAL COMMONS BEPRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.002

关键词

Nanotechnology; Food; Agriculture; Bio-synthesized nanomaterial; Bio-inspired nanomaterial; Public acceptance; Regulation

资金

  1. NSF-CREST program [The National Science Foundation-Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology (NSF-CREST)] [HRD-1547754]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid development of nanotechnology has been facilitating the transformations of traditional food and agriculture sectors, particularly the invention of smart and active packaging, nanosensors, nanopesticides and nanofertilizers. Numerous novel nanomaterials have been developed for improving food quality and safety, crop growth, and monitoring environmental conditions. In this review the most recent trends in nanotechnology are discussed and the most challenging tasks and promising opportunities in the food and agriculture sectors from selected recent studies are addressed. The toxicological fundamentals and risk assessment of nanomaterials in these new food and agriculture products are also discussed. We highlighted the potential application of bio-synthesized and bio-inspired nanomaterial for sustainable development. However, fundamental questions with regard to high performance, low toxic nanomaterials need to be addressed to fuel active development and application of nanotechnology. Regulation and legislation are also paramount to regulating the manufacturing, processing, application, as well as disposal of nanomaterials. Efforts are still needed to strengthen public awareness and acceptance of the novel nano-enabled food and agriculture products. We conclude that nanotechnology offers a plethora of opportunities, by providing a novel and sustainable alternative in the food and agriculture sectors. Copyright (C) 2018, Food and Drug Administration, Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据