4.7 Article

Macroscopic model for unsteady flow in porous media

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 862, 期 -, 页码 283-311

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.878

关键词

mathematical foundations; Navier-Stokes equations; porous media

资金

  1. French Embassy in Mexico
  2. IFAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present article reports on a formal derivation of a macroscopic model for unsteady one-phase incompressible flow in rigid and periodic porous media using an upscaling technique. The derivation is carried out in the time domain in the general situation where inertia may have a significant impact. The resulting model is non-local in time and involves two effective coefficients in the macroscopic filtration law, namely a dynamic apparent permeability tensor, H-t, and a vector, alpha, accounting for the time-decaying influence of the flow initial condition. This model generalizes previous non-local macroscale models restricted to creeping flow conditions. Ancillary closure problems are provided, which allow the effective coefficients to be computed. Symmetry and positiveness analyses of H-t are carried out, showing that this tensor is symmetric only in the creeping regime. The effective coefficients are functions of time, geometry, macroscopic forcings and the initial flow condition. This is illustrated through numerical solutions of the closure problems. Predictions are made on a simple periodic structure for a wide range of Reynolds numbers smaller than the critical value characterizing the first Hopf bifurcation. Finally, the performance of the macroscopic model for a variety of macroscopic forcings and initial conditions is examined in several case studies. Validation through comparisons with direct numerical simulations is performed. It is shown that the purely heuristic classical model, widely used for unsteady flow, consisting of a Darcy-like model complemented with an accumulation term on the filtration velocity, is inappropriate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据