4.7 Article

Simulation of air-water interfacial mass transfer driven by high-intensity isotropic turbulence

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 860, 期 -, 页码 419-440

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.884

关键词

air/sea interactions; isotropic turbulence; turbulent mixing

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e.V.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous direct numerical simulations (DNS) of mass transfer across the air-water interface have been limited to low-intensity turbulent flow with turbulent Reynolds numbers of R-T <= 500. This paper presents the first DNS of low-diffusivity interfacial mass transfer across a clean surface driven by high-intensity (1440 <= R-T <= 1856) isotropic turbulent flow diffusing from below. The detailed results, presented here for Schmidt numbers Sc = 20 and 500, support the validity of theoretical scaling laws and existing experimental data obtained at high R-T. In the DNS, to properly resolve the turbulent flow and the scalar transport at Sc = 20, up to 524 x 10(6) grid points were needed, while 65.5 x 10(9) grid points were required to resolve the scalar transport at Sc = 500, which is typical for oxygen in water. Compared to the low-R-T simulations, where turbulent mass flux is dominated by large eddies, in the present high-R-T simulation the contribution of small eddies to the turbulent mass flux was confirmed to increase significantly. Consequently, the normalised mass transfer velocity was found to agree with the R-T(-1/4) scaling, as opposed to the R-T(-1/2) scaling that is typical for low-R-T simulations. At constant R-T, the present results show that the mass transfer velocity K-L scales with Sc-1/2, which is identical to the scaling found in the large-eddy regime for R-T <= 500. As previously found for a no-slip interface, also for a shear-free interface the critical R-T separating the large- from the small-eddy regime was confirmed to be approximately R-T = 500.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据