4.7 Article

Size controlled synthesis of Ni-MOF using polyvinylpyrrolidone: New electrode material for the trace level determination of nitrobenzene

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 829, 期 -, 页码 168-176

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.10.014

关键词

Metal organic framework; Polyvinylpyrrolidone; Ni-MOF-PVP composite; Cyclic voltammetry; Nitrobenzene

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi [IF160118(2016)]
  2. DST-SERB, New Delhi [EMR/2016/002898]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports the synthesis of nickel organic framework capped with polyvinylpyrrolidone (Ni-MOF-PVP) and their modification on glassy carbon (GC) electrode for highly sensitive and selective determination of nitrobenzene (NB) by voltammetry. The Ni-MOF-PVP was synthesized by simple in-situ solvothermal method. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show that the as prepared Ni-MOF was spherical in shape with an average particle size of 322 nm. The particle size was decreased from 322 to 80 nm after the addition of 600 mg PVP to Ni-MOF. Then, the synthesized Ni-MOF-PVP was fabricated on GC electrode by drop casting. It shows two pairs of redox waves at 0.24 and 0.48 V, corresponding to Ni-II/Ni-III and Ni-III MOF-1/Ni-III MOF-2 in acetate buffer solution at pH 4. Further, the Ni-MOF-PVP modified electrode was used for the selective and sensitive determination of NB. It shows a sharp reduction peak for NB with 70 mV less positive potential and 2-fold higher reduction current when compared to bare GC electrode. The amperometric current response of NB increases while increasing its concentration from 0.2 mu M to 1 mM with a correlation coefficient of 0.9924 and the limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 97 nM (S/N = 3). Finally, the practical application of the Ni-MOF-PVP modified electrode was demonstrated by determining NB in tap and lake water samples and these results were validated with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据